Local Coverage Determination (LCD)

Magnetic-Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS) for Essential Tremor

L38495

Expand All | Collapse All
Proposed LCD
Proposed LCDs are works in progress that are available on the Medicare Coverage Database site for public review. Proposed LCDs are not necessarily a reflection of the current policies or practices of the contractor.

Document Note

Note History

Contractor Information

LCD Information

Document Information

Source LCD ID
N/A
LCD ID
L38495
Original ICD-9 LCD ID
Not Applicable
LCD Title
Magnetic-Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS) for Essential Tremor
Proposed LCD in Comment Period
N/A
Source Proposed LCD
DL38495
Original Effective Date
For services performed on or after 07/12/2020
Revision Effective Date
N/A
Revision Ending Date
N/A
Retirement Date
N/A
Notice Period Start Date
05/28/2020
Notice Period End Date
07/11/2020

CPT codes, descriptions, and other data only are copyright 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/HHSARS apply.

Fee schedules, relative value units, conversion factors and/or related components are not assigned by the AMA, are not part of CPT, and the AMA is not recommending their use. The AMA does not directly or indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. The AMA assumes no liability for data contained or not contained herein.

Current Dental Terminology © 2023 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2024, the American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois. Reproduced with permission. No portion of the AHA copyrighted materials contained within this publication may be copied without the express written consent of the AHA. AHA copyrighted materials including the UB‐04 codes and descriptions may not be removed, copied, or utilized within any software, product, service, solution, or derivative work without the written consent of the AHA. If an entity wishes to utilize any AHA materials, please contact the AHA at 312‐893‐6816.

Making copies or utilizing the content of the UB‐04 Manual, including the codes and/or descriptions, for internal purposes, resale and/or to be used in any product or publication; creating any modified or derivative work of the UB‐04 Manual and/or codes and descriptions; and/or making any commercial use of UB‐04 Manual or any portion thereof, including the codes and/or descriptions, is only authorized with an express license from the American Hospital Association. The American Hospital Association (the "AHA") has not reviewed, and is not responsible for, the completeness or accuracy of any information contained in this material, nor was the AHA or any of its affiliates, involved in the preparation of this material, or the analysis of information provided in the material. The views and/or positions presented in the material do not necessarily represent the views of the AHA. CMS and its products and services are not endorsed by the AHA or any of its affiliates.

Issue

Issue Description
Issue - Explanation of Change Between Proposed LCD and Final LCD

CMS National Coverage Policy

This LCD supplements but does not replace, modify or supersede existing Medicare applicable National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) or payment policy rules and regulations for magnetic-resonance-guided focused ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS) for essential tremor. Federal statute and subsequent Medicare regulations regarding provision and payment for medical services are lengthy. They are not repeated in this LCD. Neither Medicare payment policy rules nor this LCD replace, modify or supersede applicable state statutes regarding medical practice or other health practice professions acts, definitions and/or scopes of practice. All providers who report services for Medicare payment must fully understand and follow all existing laws, regulations and rules for Medicare payment for MRgFUS and must properly submit only valid claims for them. Please review and understand them and apply the medical necessity provisions in the policy within the context of the manual rules. Relevant CMS manual instructions and policies may be found in the following Internet-Only Manuals (IOMs) published on the CMS Web site:

IOM Citations: 

  • CMS IOM Publication 100-08, Medicare Program Integrity Manual,
    • Chapter 13, Local Coverage Determinations, Section 13.5.4 Reasonable and Necessary Provision in an LCD.

Social Security Act (Title XVIII) Standard References:

  • Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, Section 1862(a)(1)(A) states that no Medicare payment shall be made for items or services which are not reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury.
  • Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, Section 1862(a)(7). This section excludes routine physical examinations.

Coverage Guidance

Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity

Compliance with the provisions in this policy may be monitored and addressed through post payment data analysis and subsequent medical review audits.

History/Background and/or General Information

Historically, ultrasound has largely been performed as an extracranial diagnostic tool. However, more recently, intracranial therapeutic uses have been explored. One such use has been in the treatment of essential tremor (ET) that is refractory to more traditional treatment (e.g. medical therapy, deep brain stimulation [DBS]) through the use of focused ultrasound techniques. Magnetic-Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS) is a non-invasive thermal ablation treatment that delivers a spherical array of converging beams using a cranial ultrasound unit that targets specific areas in the brain and heats and ablates the areas that are felt to be responsible for the ET.

Covered Indications

MRgFUS unilateral thalamotomy is considered medically reasonable and necessary in patients with all five of the following criteria:

  1. Presence of medication refractory ET2,3 defined as refractory to at least two trials of medical therapy, including at least one first-line agent (i.e. propanalol or primidone);2 and
  2. Presence of a moderate to severe postural or intention tremor (defined by a score greater than or equal to 2 on the clinical rating score for tremor [CRST]2 or another nationally accepted clinical measure of tremor severity) of the dominant hand; and
  3. The tremor is disabling (defined by a score of greater than or equal to 2 on any of the eight items in the disability subsection of the CRST2 or another nationally accepted clinical measure of tremor severity); and
  4. The beneficiary is not a candidate for deep brain stimulation (DBS) (e.g., advanced age, anticoagulant therapy, surgical comorbidities, or has failed DBS, but has no retained cranial implants); and
  5. The beneficiary is 22 years of age or older3


Limitations

The following are considered not medically reasonable and necessary:

  1. Treatment of head or voice tremor
  2. Bilateral thalamotomy
  3. Treatment of beneficiaries who have an advanced neurodegenerative condition2
  4. Treatment of beneficiaries with unstable cardiac disease2
  5. Treatment of beneficiaries suffering from depression sufficiently severe to compromise their ability to provide informed consent and limit likely clinical benefit of the treatment
  6. Treatment of beneficiaries with severe cognitive impairment (defined by a score of less than 24 on the Mini–Mental State Examination)2
  7. A skull density ratio (SDR) (the ratio of cortical to cancellous bone) less than 0.402
  8. Treatment when contraindications to MRI are present (e.g. metallic foreign body in eye, pacemaker etc.)


Provider Qualifications

  1. Consistent with the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (ASSFN) guidelines, physicians who perform MRgFUS must possess expertise and experience in functional and stereotactic neurosurgery. Additionally, physicians who perform these services should have underdone specialized training in MRgFUS.2

Notice: Services performed for any given diagnosis must meet all of the indications and limitations stated in this policy, the general requirements for medical necessity as stated in CMS payment policy manuals, any and all existing CMS national coverage determinations, and all Medicare payment rules.

The redetermination process may be utilized for consideration of services performed outside of the reasonable and necessary requirements in this LCD.

Summary of Evidence

Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy Location Determines Clinical Benefits in Patients with Essential Tremor

Magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy is a novel and minimally invasive ablative treatment for essential tremor. This study examined relationships in patients with essential tremor undergoing MRgFUS. Boutet et al. studied 66 patients with essential tremor who underwent MRgFUS between 2012 and 2017. The study assessed the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) scores at 3 months after the procedure and tracked the adverse effects (sensory, motor, speech, gait, and dysmetria) 1 day (acute) and 3 months after the procedure. The results indicated the area of optimal tremor response at 3 months after the procedure was identified at the posterior portion of the ventral intermediate nucleus. Lesions extending beyond the posterior region of the ventral intermediate nucleus and lateral to the lateral thalamic border were associated with increased risk of acute adverse sensory and motor effects, respectively.1


Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Neurosurgery for Essential Tremor: A Health Technology Assessment

In this study, a systematic review of the clinical literature published up to April 11, 2017, that examined MRgFUS neurosurgery alone or compared with other interventions for the treatment of moderate to severe, medication-refractory essential tremor was performed. The review assessed the risk of bias of each study and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. The inclusion criteria was that the articles were all full text publications in English, all published prior to April 11, 2017, were randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and nonrandomized studies of MRgFUS neurosurgery alone or MRgFUS neurosurgery compared with one or more of the following: radiofrequency thalamotomy, deep brain stimulation (unilateral or bilateral), gamma Knife thalamotomy, or control intervention.

The evidence shows that MRgFUS neurosurgery is generally safe and effective at reducing tremor severity, improving quality of life, and helping people get back to their daily activities.4 MRgFUS neurosurgery offers a treatment option for people with essential tremor who otherwise have none if medication fails, and it offers a noninvasive option for people considering surgery who cannot safely have invasive surgery or who find the risks of invasive surgery unacceptable.

Acute and Chronic Effects of Propranolol and Primidone in Essential Tremor (ET)

This is a 1989 study of the effects of these two drugs on ET. Koller et al. studied the acute and chronic effects of propranolol and primidone in essential tremor by administering long-acting propranolol (80 to 160 mg/d) and primidone (50 to 250 mg/d) to 50 patients. The study evaluated patients at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment and assessed tremor by subjective rating by patients, clinical scoring, and tremorgraphic (accelerometer) recordings.

The results indicated that acute adverse reactions occurred in 8% with propranolol and 32% with primidone.5 Propranolol was without therapeutic effect in 30% and 32% had no benefit from primidone. Significant chronic side effects occurred in 17% taking propranolol and in 0% with primidone.5 Tolerance to drug effect occurred with chronic treatment in 12.5% of patients with propranolol and 13.0% with primidone.

Analysis of Evidence (Rationale for Determination)

MRgFUS is a promising new treatment approach that has attributes, positive and negative. It is noted that lesions larger than 170 mm were associated with an increased risk of acute adverse effects.3 Tremor improvement and acute adverse effects of MRgFUS for essential tremor are highly dependent on the location and size of lesions. These novel findings could refine current MRgFUS treatment planning and targeting, thereby improving clinical outcomes in patients.

Also, people with essential tremor reported positive experiences with the procedure and results experienced with MRgFUS neurosurgery.4 The reduction or elimination of tremor in the dominant hand increased people’s ability to perform daily tasks and improved their quality of life.

In summary, MRgFUS is a promising new treatment approach that has attributes, positive and negative, distinct from both traditional thalamotomy and DBS. Given the support for traditional thalamotomy, generally, as an alternative “if DBS is not available or practical”, and the support for MRgFUS thalamotomy, specifically, as an alternative in patients “who are not candidates for DBS” by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) and the American Association of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (ASSFN), Novitas considers MRgFUS reasonable and necessary when performed within the indications and limitations of this policy.

Proposed Process Information

Synopsis of Changes
Changes Fields Changed
N/A
Associated Information
Sources of Information
Bibliography
Open Meetings
Meeting Date Meeting States Meeting Information
N/A
Contractor Advisory Committee (CAC) Meetings
Meeting Date Meeting States Meeting Information
N/A
MAC Meeting Information URLs
N/A
Proposed LCD Posting Date
Comment Period Start Date
Comment Period End Date
Reason for Proposed LCD
Requestor Information
This request was MAC initiated.
Requestor Name Requestor Letter
View Letter
N/A
Contact for Comments on Proposed LCD

Coding Information

Bill Type Codes

Code Description

Please accept the License to see the codes.

N/A

Revenue Codes

Code Description

Please accept the License to see the codes.

N/A

CPT/HCPCS Codes

Please accept the License to see the codes.

N/A

ICD-10-CM Codes that Support Medical Necessity

Group 1

Group 1 Paragraph:

N/A

Group 1 Codes:

N/A

N/A

ICD-10-CM Codes that DO NOT Support Medical Necessity

Group 1

Group 1 Paragraph:

N/A

Group 1 Codes:

N/A

N/A

Additional ICD-10 Information

General Information

Associated Information


Refer the Local Coverage Article, A57839, Billing and Coding: Magnetic-Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS) for Essential Tremor for all coding information.

Sources of Information


Contractor Medical Directors

Bibliography
  1. Boutet A, Ranjan M, Zhong J., et al. Focused ultrasound thalamotomy location. Brain A journal of Neurology. 2018:1-10. doi:10.1093/brain/awy278.
  2. FDA approval ExAblate Neuro. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf15/P150038a.pdf. Accessed 3/5/2018.
  3. ASSFN Society News. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. 2015;93(2):149-149. doi:10.1159/000381248.
  4. Health Quality Ontario. magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound neurosurgery for essential tremor: a health technology assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser [Internet]. 2018 May;18(4):1–141. Available from: http://www.hqontario.ca/evidence-to-improve-care/journal-ontario-health-technology-assessment-series.
  5. Koller WC, Vetere-Overfield B. Acute and chronic effects of propranolol and primidone in essential tremor. Neurology. 1989;39(12):1587-1587. doi:10.1212/wnl.39.12.1587.
  6. American Society For Stereotactic And Functional Neurosurgery. ASSFN Position Statement on MR-guided Focused Ultrasound for the Management of Essential Tremor. American Society For Stereotactic And Functional Neurosurgery. http://www.assfn.org/clinical.html. Accessed October 30, 2019.
  7. Bour P, Marquet F, Ozenne V, et al. Real-time monitoring of tissue displacement and temperature changes during MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2017;78(5):1911-1921. doi:10.1002/mrm.26588.
  8. Chazen JL, Sarva H, Stieg PE, et al. Clinical improvement associated with targeted interruption of the cerebellothalamic tract following MR-guided focused ultrasound for essential tremor. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2018;129(2):315-323. doi:10.3171/2017.4.jns162803.
  9. Deuschl G, Raethjen J, Hellriegel H, Elble R. Treatment of patients with essential tremor. The Lancet Neurology. 2011;10(2):148-161. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70322-7.
  10. Louis ED. Essential Tremor. Animal Models of Movement Disorders. 2005:347-359. doi:10.1016/b978-012088382-0/50031-1.
  11. Louis ED, Ferreira JJ. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. Movement Disorders. 2010;25(5):534-541. doi:10.1002/mds.22838.
  12. Louis ED, Machado DG. Tremor-related quality of life: A comparison of essential tremor vs. Parkinsons disease patients. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2015;21(7):729-735. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.04.019.
  13. Park YS, Jung NY, Na YC, Chang JW. Four-year follow-up results of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. Movement Disorders. 2019;34(5):727-734. doi:10.1002/mds.27637.
  14. Whiting BB, Whiting AC, Whiting DM. Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation. Progress in Neurological Surgery. Current Concepts in Movement Disorder Management. 2018:198-206. doi:10.1159/000481104.
  15. Zaaroor M, Sinai A, Goldsher D, Eran A, Nassar M, Schlesinger I. Magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for tremor: a report of 30 Parkinsons disease and essential tremor cases. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2018;128(1):202-210. doi:10.3171/2016.10.jns16758.
  16. Zesiewicz TA, Elble R, Louis ED, et al. Practice Parameter: Therapies for essential tremor: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2005;64(12):2008-2020. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000163769.28552.cd.
  17. Zesiewicz TA, Elble RJ, Louis ED, et al. Evidence-based guideline update: Treatment of essential tremor: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2011;77(19):1752-1755. doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e318236f0fd.

Revision History Information

Revision History Date Revision History Number Revision History Explanation Reasons for Change
N/A

Associated Documents

Attachments
N/A
Related National Coverage Documents
N/A
Public Versions
Updated On Effective Dates Status
05/21/2020 07/12/2020 - N/A Currently in Effect You are here

Keywords

N/A

Read the LCD Disclaimer